U.S Marine Cpl. Lance Morrow patrols in Helmand province, Afghanistan.
America’s wars are remote. They’re remote from us geographically, remote from us emotionally (unless you’re serving in the military or have a close relative or friend who serves), and remote from our major media outlets, which have given us no compelling narrative about them, except that they’re being fought by
“America’s heroes” against foreign terrorists and evil-doers. They’re even being fought, in significant part, by remote control -- by
robotic drones “piloted” by ground-based operators from a
secret network of bases located hundreds, if not thousands, of miles from the danger of the battlefield.
Their remoteness, which breeds detachment if not complacency at home, is no accident. Indeed, it’s a product of the fact that Afghanistan and Iraq were wars of choice, not wars of necessity. It’s a product of the fact that we’ve chosen to create a “warrior” or
“war fighter” caste in this country, which we send with few concerns and fewer qualms to
prosecute Washington’s foreign wars of choice.
The results have been predictable, as in
predictably bad. The troops suffer. Iraqi and Afghan
innocents suffer even more. And yet we don’t suffer, at least not in ways that are easily noticeable, because of that very remoteness.
READ MORE HERE:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175477/tomgram%3A_william_astore%2C_the_remoteness_of_1%25_wars/